# Appropriate way to include additional top-level links?

**URL:** <https://discuss.jsonapi.org/t/appropriate-way-to-include-additional-top-level-links/801>\
**Category:** Uncategorized\
**Created:** [October 12, 2016, 3:40am UTC](https://discuss.jsonapi.org/t/appropriate-way-to-include-additional-top-level-links/801 "2016-10-12T03:40:56Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 3

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![jlangley](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/9e8a1a/32.png) [@jlangley](https://discuss.jsonapi.org/u/jlangley)\
**Post date:** [October 12, 2016, 9:19pm UTC](https://discuss.jsonapi.org/t/appropriate-way-to-include-additional-top-level-links/801/3 "2016-10-12T21:19:52Z")

</div>

> [@scottmcdonald](#):
>
> If your second interpretation is confirmed by the specification owners

Confirmed [here](http://discuss.jsonapi.org/t/links-object-clarification-needed/130)

And yes, since collections are **not** resources in JSON API, `meta` seems like the best way to go here.

---

_[View the full topic](https://discuss.jsonapi.org/t/appropriate-way-to-include-additional-top-level-links/801)._